musicisum’s fourteen comments
-
Re: Online survey about traditional music TV programmes.
Thanks for all the responses here folks, it's been really interesting to hear what people think about the various programmes and style of presentation. The responses will become part of the data in my research but individual comments, which are anonymous ... more…
-
Re: Online survey about traditional music TV programmes.
Hi again folks, I've nearly 20 responses and there's been some interesting thoughts and comments. I'd love to get 50 responses so please take a minute or two if you can over the next few days, and let me know your thoughts. As already stated, it's complet... more…
-
Re: Online survey about traditional music TV programmes.
I've added a couple of questions relating to information provided in some of the answers. Feel free to take the survey again and answer the new questions, perhaps noting you have already responded in the text box answers. more…
-
Re: Online survey about traditional music TV programmes.
Really interesting comments so far. It is completely anonymous and I have no information at all about any respondents so do feel free to write whatever you feel. more…
-
Re: Online survey about traditional music TV programmes.
Hi Gam, it's provided by Google forms. more…
-
Re: Online survey about traditional music TV programmes.
Thanks for that Michael, more…
-
Re: Online survey about traditional music TV programmes.
Hi, I have no idea how this is possible Gam, the form doesn't require any email addresses or identifying factors. Gumtree are owned by Ebay and they are not not, as far as I am aware, affiliated with Google in any way. more…
-
Online survey about traditional music TV programmes.
Hi there, more…
-
No problem, i can totally understand the responses and will try to make sure any future posts are checked properly against different recordings etc. I guess Spotify may come in handy for this. more…
-
Trying…
As to the spelling, I wrote it as it's written in the sleevenotes on the Shooglenifty album. I have now corrected this. more…